Are Apologetics Making A Comeback?

In a Christianity Today article entitled “A New Day for Apologetics,”  reporter Troy Anderson writes that “people young and old are flocking to hear-and be changed by-winsome arguments for the Christian faith.”

The author quotes apologist Lee Strobel as saying, “It wasn’t too many years ago that scholars were writing off apologetics because we live in a postmodern world where young people are not supposed to be interested in things like the historical Jesus…The biggest shock is that among people who communicated to me that they had found faith in Christ through apologetics, the single biggest group was 16-to-24-year-olds.”

According to Strobel, more people than ever are attending apologetics seminars and getting degrees in philosophy in an effort to combat the militant atheism that has surfaced in college classrooms, TV documentaries, and best-selling books.

The article reports that “Strobel is convinced apologetics helps bring people to God.”

Okay, I have to admit I had a slightly negative response to the article. Having grown up in the conservative evangelical subculture during the 80s and 90s, when the Apostle Paul’s instruction to “always be ready with an answer” became the rallying cry of Christians around the country, I got bombarded with apologetics. I read every Josh McDowell book on the shelf, attended apologetics seminars like Summit, memorized nearly every argument in support of Christianity, went to a Christian college…and STILL had a major faith crisis during my young adulthood.

What I found was that always being ready with an answer didn’t always work. I knew the “Christian response” to the Problem of Evil like the back of my hand, but it somehow didn’t make as much sense in India, where I struggled to understand why so many children had been orphaned by AIDS. I knew how to prove that Jesus rose from the dead, but I couldn’t convince my non-Christian coworkers that Jesus was alive and well in the Church today, when so many of them had been mistreated by believers. I knew how to win an argument with a universalist, but couldn’t quiet my own nagging questions about the eternal destiny of the un-evangelized. I’d built my faith on answers, so when I started asking questions, my faith began to crumble.

I grew up believing that the best way to win people to Christ was to win an argument. But my experience since graduating from college has been that most people (including myself) seem most drawn to Christianity when they are touched by people who are simply living like Christ.

This is one of the things I like about the Emerging Church and folks like Shane Claiborne. I like that they emphasize caring for the poor and sick over sitting in conferences and arguing over theology. I like that they talk about understanding and respecting people of other faiths and backgrounds rather than shooting them down. I like that they don’t talk about “the culture war” or “the battle for truth,” but about peace and kindness. I like that they don’t always have to be right.

Perhaps the two camps will provide a nice balance for one another?

Now, I’m not saying that there is no room for apologetics at all. Certainly we must be prepared to address the scientific, historical, and philosophical objections to Christianity that often prove to be stumbling blocks on the journey to faith. Books ought to be written on and seminars ought to be presented.  But if  apologetics are indeed making a comeback, I just hope we can avoid the kind of militant rationalism that characterized the apologetics movement of the 80s and 90s.

I hope we will keep in mind that God’s existence cannot be empirically proven and that “faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.” I hope we will remember that, more often that not, what keeps a person from embracing the gospel is not that he hasn’t seen enough evidence to support the existence of God in science or in logic, but that he hasn’t seen enough evidence to support the existence of God among the people who claim to be following Him. I hope we remember that a faith that leaves no room for questions is not really faith at all. I hope we will balance our words of truth with acts of mercy and goodness.

Paul wrote that we should “always be ready to give an answer for the hope that is within [us].” I don’t think he meant that we should always be ready to win an argument. I think he meant that we ought to live lives that are so outrageously hope-filled, so counter-intuitive and self-sacrificing that people will ask us who we on earth we are following.

What do you think? Do you think apologetics are making a comeback? Do you agree with Strobel that “apologetics bring people to God”?


Kevin Williams
Comment
Re: Are Apologetics Making A Comeback?
Reply #1 on : Wed July 16, 2008, 17:38:15
I am uncomfortable with a push towards apologetics. While I do understand that we should be ready to take on diferent arguements, the cal of the gospel is humility and love. I believe Christians spend far too much time trying to gain "Christian Knowledge,"however, we are not living with love. Apologitics might be helpful, but they are pointless if we are not a humble, loving community. Our nation does not need logic; it needs authentic communty.
Comment
Re: Are Apologetics Making A Comeback?
Reply #2 on : Thu July 17, 2008, 02:05:27
Sadly, the evidence for Christianity is as solid as the vision Paul allegedly had of a man from Macedonia or the dream Joseph allegedly had of an angel telling him his wife had not had sex.

Christianity - they literally dreamed up bits of it :-)
Mitch
Comment
Apologetics
Reply #3 on : Thu July 17, 2008, 06:11:53
I think apologetics have been around and will always be around until Christ returns. Apologetic arguments are powerful tools to remove intellectual obstacles to faith. Faith only comes by the Holy Spirit's moving as a person's heart as they hear the Word of God declared.

Rachel, I'm very sorry for the experiences you've had that have left such a bad taste in your mouth regarding apologetics, Christianity as a series of logical syllogisms, or whatever has so strongly jaded your view of the church (at least as it is today).

I agree with almost everything you have said in this post. My concern is that your previous experiences seem to be filled with argument and intellect, while devoid of love in action. The danger is that in trying to get out of that "ditch", you will cross the center line and go into the other "ditch" of mindlessly proclaiming love, but ignoring truth, apologetics, and the complete revelation of God in the Bible which includes more than just God's love and a list of nice things to do to each other.

In many ways I don't understand your struggle which is why I think our ideas collide so often. I was raised in a "fundamental" church background but it was not the caricature so often alluded to and disdainfully described by today's emerging church. My experience was with folks that may not have been intellectually critical enough or may have had too many lists of rules to keep, but nonetheless lived sacrificially to futher the gospel and care for the poor, needy, fatherless, and widows in their community. Though there was great admiration for apologetics and intensive Bible study, the focus was on living as common folks in community with our unbelieving neighbors in a way that would draw them to Christ.

I grew up spending a lot of time in the trailer parks, with the poor, rough kids in the neighborhood, and visiting and working for the elderly in our community. I know, because our culture won't let me forget, that my experience with "fundamentalists" is not universal. My encouragement to you is that your experience isn't universal either.

Please don't give up on truth, apolgetics, the church, or people like me because of the difficult experiences that you've had. Don't find yourself in the ditch across the road from where you started. There's only one way to stay in the middle. That is to fix our eyes on Jesus, the author and perfecter of our faith, His revelation to us through the Bible, confirmed by His Holy Spirit's testimony, applied in our daily lives.

I continue to hope that this blog will find that balance and push us all to love God with our heart, strength, soul, and mind.
Last Edit: July 17, 2008, 06:15:02 by Mitch  
Comment
Re: Are Apologetics Making A Comeback?
Reply #4 on : Fri July 18, 2008, 05:37:43
Wow--another challenging post. As I read your post and the other comments I began to wonder: Is it true apologetics that are seeing a comeback or a desire to know the gospel Jesus as opposed to the Building-Based Christianity/country club Jesus? Maybe a clearer way to say it is: Are we digging into the Bible more to find answers to "what" we believe or rather "who" we believe in and "why"?
kristen
Comment
Re: Are Apologetics Making A Comeback?
Reply #5 on : Sat July 19, 2008, 12:05:37
i am not sure that apologetics ever died down, actually.

i agree with mitch--we must remember that there are exceptions to the fundamentalist apologist stereotype and that apologetics are not a substitute for speaking and acting in love. we on this blog have witnessed mitch be that exception--he often disagrees with rachel, but always does so with patience and respect, rather than anger and a desire to win an arguement. no one can argue someone into faith in Jesus, but one can lovingly listen and discuss and help them through obstacles. we must be sensitive and remember that we offer no person faith--the Spirit inspires it.

mitch, i know you don't understand the struggles that rachel has had in her faith--i find your confidence equally unfathomable but it is refreshing to hear what you have to say from someone who isn't a jerk about it.

hmm--i didn't quite mean my response to turn into a chat about mitch but i have been thinking about his attitude in discussions on this blog a bit lately and thoughts will out. :)
Howard Pepper
Comment
Re: Are Apologetics Making A Comeback?
Reply #6 on : Fri August 01, 2008, 04:42:35
I was well-informed on apologetics in the 70s, being a serious apologist myself, seminary educated and working with Christian Research Inst. (So. Cal.) and Walter Martin for 4 years. I remained a Christian for another 15 years, ministering more in professional counseling and churches, but still following the field some.

The more recent versions of apologetics seem quite similar, from my more limited exposure to the orthodox viewpoint now. (I read on NT issues and Christian origins extensively, including just some conservative authors.) Apologists now address somewhat different issues, of course, as dictated by pertinent developments. Often they are primarily responding to heterodox popular works like those of Bart Ehrman or the Jesus Seminar authors. (It would sure be nice to see more apologists pursue actual mutually-exploring dialog with people like these, and not just point-counterpoint debate!)

To my greatly "liberalized" faith of the last dozen years, I find few apologists addressing the truly core issues. Actually, these issues fall more into the category of NT scholarship, a highly complex and specialized field itself. The issues deal heavily with matters of authorship, social/political context, and the often subtle, yet crucial clues about the text-development processes found IN THE NT TEXTS themselves, as well as in contemporaneous literature.

And even most of the "liberals" in NT scholarship I find much too readily tend to work from assumptions about the supposed historicity of various elements of the Jesus story, and that of his earliest followers. Both apologists and OT or NT scholars tend to be too specialized, whereas an interdisciplinary approach is really just about required to increase our understanding of the real picture of Christian origins, what Jesus really taught and did, etc. It is admittedly very demanding to gain the kind of breadth and depth involved in that. Incidentally, a couple of the few to have gained that kind of broad expertise are Jonathan Z. Smith and Burton Mack.

They are greatly important contributors partly because they, with a few others, focus heavily on the social aspects of myth-building as one element of creating religious communities and practices. The needs, the unsettlement, and thus the experimentation, creativity, and newness were extreme in the first century period, both Paul's day and even more intensely after the Roman-Jewish war and destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple.

In summary, I guess I'm saying that apologetics can help people know what and why they believe, and may reassure some, but often not in a realistic way. Rather, most of it diverts from the real issues of history and of interpretation and application--love, service, transformation, and such, which you, Rachel, express so well. Thank you for your work.

Write a comment

  • Required fields are bold and marked with *.

If you have trouble reading the code, click on the code itself to generate a new random code.
Security Code:*
 

get an account to edit future comments
and remove the captcha security code